atw58 wrote:
Other than protection and support of basic functionality, do electrolytics contribute to the sound in a noticeable way. For example if the current draw from the power supply is small, when the volume is low/moderate, perhaps the old cap may work just fine. Or does it depend on where the cap is used i.e. signal coupling vs power supply.
Wonder if folks can comment on what type of recapping improves overall sound.
That implies that there are 2 kinds of recapping: one that restores the equipment to its orginal specs to compensate for the ageing and degradation of the electrolytic caps, the other to "improve" on the original specifications and sound of the equipment. So, essentially both types of recapping will improve the sound, just that one will attempt to improve on the sound the equipment originally had.
Another automobile analogy: your original 4 season radial tires are worn to the point of no longer having any traction, so either you replace the tires with the same brand, model and size as the originals or you install wide, forged magnesium wheels with wider, ultra high performance summer tires and while you are at it, you change your brakes for fancy carbon fibre ones with racing hubs and also replace the suyspension arms with forged alloy pieces and racing shock absorbers.
Will both of the tire replacements result in an improvement? Of course, only the first will cost you $400 and bring your car back to its original performance and the second will cost you $10,000 and bring your car well beyond its original specs.
What I am proposing is that when you buy any piece of vintage gear, you at least check to see if the tires are bald before attempting to tackle a winding mountain road at high speed and if they show the need for replacement, to at least replace them with new ones. How far you want to go and spend is up to you!